Document petition dismissed for delay and for not assigning reasons for delay = no explanation was forthcoming from the petitioner/defendant as to why this document was sought to be filed at a belated stage.= the petitioner/defendant had earlier filed I.A.No.1368 of 2012 on 27.11.2012 seeking to adduce additional documentary evidence. The said I.A. was allowed by the Court below. Again, the petitioner/defendant filed the present I.A. to receive one more document. The affidavit filed in support of this I.A. was bereft of reasons as to why this document was not filed along with the earlier I.A. As pointed out by the Court below, no explanation was forthcoming from the petitioner/defendant as to why this document was sought to be filed at a belated stage.

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR

CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.156 of 2013

 

DATED:  25.02.2013

 

Between:

 

V.Venkatalaxmi

   ...  Petitioner/Defendant

And

 

 

M.Venkateswara Prasada Reddy              …   Respondent/Plaintiff

                                      

The Court made the following:

                         HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR

CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.156 of 2013

ORDER:       

The defendant in O.S.No.570 of 2002 on the file of the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Khammam, is the  petitioner.  She filed I.A.No.1490 of 2012 in O.S.No.570 of 2002 to receive an additional document.  By order dated 27.12.2012, the Court below dismissed the said I.A.  Hence, this Civil Revision Petition.

2. Perusal of the order under revision reflects that the petitioner/defendant had earlier filed I.A.No.1368 of 2012 on 27.11.2012 seeking to adduce additional documentary evidence.  The said I.A. was allowed by the Court below.  Again, the petitioner/defendant filed the present I.A. to receive one more document.  The affidavit filed in support of this I.A. was bereft of reasons as to why this document was not filed along with the earlier I.A.  As pointed out by the Court below, no explanation was forthcoming from the petitioner/defendant as to why this document was sought to be filed at a belated stage.

3. This Court therefore, finds no reason to interfere with the order dated 27.12.2012 passed by the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Khammam, in I.A.No.1490 of 2012 in O.S.No.570 of 2012.

4. The civil revision petition is accordingly dismissed. CRP MP No.223 of 2013 shall stand dismissed in consequence. No costs.

_________________

SANJAY KUMAR, J

Date: 25^th February, 2013

Pab/Bsb

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR

 

 

 

 

 

 

                   

 

                                   

 

 

 

 

CIVIL REVISION PETITION  No.156 of 2013

                                           25^th February, 2013

                             

Pab/Bss