CRLP 972 / 2013 | CRLPSR 3488 / 2013 |
|
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY
Criminal Petition Nos.972 and 976 of 2013
C O M M O N - O R D E R:-
The petitioners apprehend arrest in Cr.No.185 of 2012 of Central Crime Station, Hyderabad, registered for the offences under sections 196, 209, 210, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 469, 471, 472 read with 34 and 120-B of I.P.C.
The accusation made against the petitioners is that they fabricated the sale deed dated 18.05.1996 and obtained loans from various banks. Thereafter, Smt Geeta Santosh (Petitioner in Criminal Petition No.972 of 2013) executed a sale deed in favour of Jr.N.T.Ramarao on 15.10.2003 suppressing the earlier encumbrances and thereby cheated the purchaser Jr. N.T.Ramarao.
Heard learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State.
It is contended by the learned counsel appearing for petitioners that the petitioners are innocent of the accusations levelled against them and therefore they deserve for grant of anticipatory bail. A further contention has been advanced that the petitioner in Criminal Petition No.972 of 2013 never deposited the title deeds of her house plot in any of the banks.
Learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the applications on the ground that investigation done so far revealed that the petitioner in Criminal petition No.976 of 2013 namely Sri S. Vishnu Charan is the person responsible for raising loans from various banks by depositing the duplicate title deeds and therefore he does not deserve for grant of anticipatory bail.
I have gone through the case dairy placed on record. The principal accusations are made against Sri S. Vishnu Charan who is petitioner in Criminal Petition No.976 of 2013, with regard to fabrication of the sale deed dated 18.05.1996. In that view of the matter, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner in Criminal Petition No.976 of 2013.
The petitioner in Criminal Petition No.972 of 2013 namely
Smt Geeta Santosh has asserted that she never appeared before any of the financial institutions and offered the house plot as security for the loan availed by Usha Gautami Batteries, Sunku Auto Limited, Surya Harsha enterprises and Usha Gautami enterprises. In that view of the matter, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner in Criminal Petition No.972 of 2013 on certain conditions.
Smt Geeta Santosh has asserted that she never appeared before any of the financial institutions and offered the house plot as security for the loan availed by Usha Gautami Batteries, Sunku Auto Limited, Surya Harsha enterprises and Usha Gautami enterprises. In that view of the matter, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner in Criminal Petition No.972 of 2013 on certain conditions.
Accordingly, the Criminal Petition No.972 of 2013 is allowed. The petitioner Smt Geeta Santosh is directed to surrender herself before the Station House Officer, Central Crime Station, Hyderabad within a week, and on such surrender, she shall be released on bail on her executing personal bond for a sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the same Station House Officer, and on further condition that she shall appear before the Station House Officer, Central Crime Station, Hyderabad once in a week i.e., on every Saturday in between 10:00 AM and 05:00 PM, for a period of four weeks or till filing of the charge-sheet, whichever is earlier.
The Criminal Petition No.976 of 2013 is dismissed.
_________________________
B. Seshasayana Reddy, J
25th February, 2013.
Sr/vjl
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.