Encroachments, unauthorized constructions - un authorised parking narrowing the roads, pavements & foot paths= causing inconvenience to public - PIL- ALLOWED =

writ declaring the action of the respondents in permitting the encroachments in the pavements/cellars of the commercial complexes in Narsaraopet Municipality is illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to take action against the owners and occupiers who encroached the cellars of Multi Storied building complexes and main roads including pavements, footpaths and to undertake removal of the encroachments on the main road and pavements and ensure that remedial steps are taken regularly to improve the traffic.” =

We accordingly direct the District Collector, Guntur, the Superintendent of Police, Guntur, the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Narsaraopet and the Commissioner, Narsaraopet Municipality, respondent Nos. 2,4,5 and 6 herein, to take the following steps:

1) The municipal authority shall identify all the un-authorized constructions, which have been made and shall take steps for demolition of such unauthorized constructions in accordance with law. This exercise shall be completed within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

2) Respondent No. 5, with the help of respondent No.6 shall take steps forthwith to see that there shall not be parking of any vehicles on either side of the road in congested areas. There shall not be any parking of the vehicles in and around the bus stops in busy market area.

3) There shall be suitable parking places, which must be located away from the market area or congested area and parking shall be done at a stipulated place.

4) In relatively empty areas of the road, one side parking may be provided. All the respondents shall ensure that there must not be any encroachments on the pavements by parking or occupation in any manner whatsoever and the pavements shall be kept free from all obstructions so that the pedestrians can pass through the pavements comfortably and safely.

The aforesaid measures shall be taken by the respondents forthwith on supply of a copy of this order. The District Collector, Guntur shall ensure that the aforesaid directions of the Court are complied with and he shall also submit a compliance report in the matter within four weeks in the registry.

The Public Interest Litigation is accordingly disposed of. The interim applications, if any, pending shall also stand disposed of. No costs.

PIL 91 / 2013

PILSR 21314 / 2013

PETITIONER		RESPONDENT
P. RAJASEKHAR, GUNTUR DIST & 3 OTHERS	VS	PRL SECY MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, HYD & 5 OT
PET.ADV. : VIDYASAGAR		RESP.ADV. : GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN & URBAN DEV
SUBJECT: PIL Cases		DISTRICT: GUNTUR

THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA

AND

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C BHANU

Public Interest Litigation No. 91 OF 2013

DATED: 22.7.2013

Between:

P. Rajasekhar,

Narsaraopet,

Guntur District and others.

… Petitioners

And

The Government of Andhra Pradesh

represented by its Principal Secretary,

Municipal Administration and Urban Development,

Hyderabad and others.

… Respondents

THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA

AND

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C BHANU

Public Interest Litigation No.91 of 2013

Order: (per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)

The petitioners filed the present Public Interest Litigation, seeking the relief as follows:

“to issue an order, direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of the respondents in permitting the encroachments in the pavements/cellars of the commercial complexes in Narsaraopet Municipality is illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to take action against the owners and occupiers who encroached the cellars of Multi Storied building complexes and main roads including pavements, footpaths and to undertake removal of the encroachments on the main road and pavements and ensure that remedial steps are taken regularly to improve the traffic.”

It is also seen from the record that on an earlier occasion, the 1^st petitioner filed a petition before the Mandal Legal Services Committee, Lok Adalat, Narsaraopet, seeking the relief as follows:

“1) To direct the Police, Traffic Police, RTO and DSP to take measures so that the pavements are vacated for public use, to see that the auto rickshaws are being driven by licensed drivers and to prevent the autos being driven by minors, to see that action be taken against reckless, overloading auto rickshaws and to see that cars are removed from road at Atchireddy complex area by travels and to see that roads are not used for parking the vehicles just like that and direct all the respondents to submit report to the Court once in every two months with regard to the steps taken in improving the traffic till order is completely restored in the town.

2) To direct the Commissioner to take measures against owner who violate building plan and direct them to provide cellars for parking purpose by removing the shops at cellars and direct all the Departments to take steps for providing parking places starting from railway gate and direct them not to regularize the builders whose apartments are constructed by violating the approved plans.

3) Further to direct the Manager, APSRTC, Narsaraopet not to stop the buses at bridge center at Lord Siva Statue and on Palnadu Road and at 1^st Railway gate and direct them to bring the Palnadu Bus stop into use which was constructed with public money and which was left unnoticed and unused and also direct the Manager, APSRTC, Narsaraopet to direct their drivers not to stop the buses either at the turnings or immediately after taking turning at the middle of the road.

4) To direct the concerned to take steps and to see that people shall not gather in groups on road obstructing the traffic.”

It is alleged in this Public Interest Litigation that there are unauthorized construction of the buildings and also indiscriminate and unruly parking of vehicles and thereby road space has been narrowed down to such an extent that no passer by can go through the road. It is also clear that the buses could not ply on the roads because of parking of the vehicles and further the buses do not stop at certain stops because of illegal parking. Photographs have also been annexed to the petition from which, it is clearly established that there has been unruly and irregular parking of vehicles on all sides of the roads and the roads have been narrowed down because of the illegal parking. These photographs also show that the buses cannot be plied smoothly.

The municipal authorities have also filed counter affidavit wherein it has been admitted that there has been unauthorized occupations in the cellars and there has been unauthorized and illegal parking encroaching the pavements. Further admission has been made that unauthorized construction of buildings have been done.

Therefore, the allegations contained in the petition are established and the remedial measures as indicated in the counter affidavit are not sufficient. We feel that all the respondents must act jointly in order to address the problems, which have been indicated in the present petition.

3) There shall be suitable parking places, which must be located away from the market area or congested area and parking shall be done at a stipulated place.

The Public Interest Litigation is accordingly disposed of. The interim applications, if any, pending shall also stand disposed of. No costs.

________________________

K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ

______________________

K.C. BHANU, J

22.07.2013

pnb

A.P.H.C.CASE LAW - ADVOCATEMMMOHAN

Search This Blog

Public Interest Litigation No. 91 OF 2013

Public Interest Litigation No.91 of 2013

Comments

Post a Comment